---
The crux of minimalism is
finding the right balance of visual elements that serves to attract and not
distract. As such, it is often associated with a primitive color palette of
monochrome or comprising colors with a minimal gradient range, sleek and blank
surfaces and a contrast between two and three dimensions, or a general use of
space. This gives a piece of minimalist work its characteristic visual quality
of being bare and stripped to a skeletal necessity- a style that usually either
evokes a sense of stark clarity in the viewer or is perceived by him or her to
be elusive, sometimes incapable of meaning and conveying nothing but itself. At
other times, the artist may create an acoustic space within the visuals. Upon
stepping into this range one feels as in both a muted natural landscape with a
subdued, almost pleasant musical quality, and in an infinite, formless space
which amplifies all sound with increasing intensity.
As these visual elements
still reach out to the observer, attempting to attune him or her to the core
essence of the artwork, making minimalism synonymous with objectivity is not
quite in the spirit of the concept as it devalues the interaction the artwork
has with its audience. Taking off from here, the nature of minimalism is very
much interdependent- it functions as a two-way relationship between the
audience, the material and visual form of the artwork and the creative process
behind its creation. Ultimately it establishes an intimacy between the audience
and the artist himself, because the artwork is after all a manifestation of his
artistic identity, and a medium through which both sides can connect.
Working with this framework,
one would find that the expression of minimalism is diverse. Ornament need not
function as its direct adversary- because an implicit understanding of the
clockworks of excess is the key to the skillful handling of the reduction
mechanism required in the practice of minimalism. In fact when both co-exist in
a single piece of work it can be argued that the contrast works in favor
minimalism, as the eye has a tendency to be drawn to absence in the midst of
overwhelming presence. In any case both visual philosophies, though not
necessarily opposite ends of the spectrum, have a potential to complement and
enhance each other- because like many concepts that are perceived to share
opposing polarities they are responses born out of each other, rendering them
inherently intertwined. Minimalism deflates when its artist forgets to engage
its counterpart.
Minimalism in fashion can be
explored on two core tiers- namely individual garments, and their collective
presentation as a body of work. In discrete garments minimalism usually takes
shape in the form of a single, compelling focal point- whether the silhouette,
tailoring, or a detail such as draping or a deliberate contrast in fabric. This
focal point should be potent enough to permeate the overarching visual concept
of the collection while at the same time retaining a sufficient degree of
versatility to be explored and subsequently, evolve. In a collection,
minimalism takes on a macro-scale, where it usually manifests in a strict
homogeneity in color scheme, nature of fabric and sometimes silhouette. A good
minimalist tale, like any other collection, should possess a clear chronology
on the evolution of visual elements- while unlike any other collection the
artist redirects majority of his aesthetic and conceptual awareness towards the
focal point-in-question, such that it is the best representative of the
artist’s mind, and the audience be able to track his stream of consciousness
just by watching its development closely.
It is perhaps apt to end with
a reflection on the value of minimalism. While many champions of minimalism
have subscribed to its practice as their aesthetic compass aligns perfectly
with its coordinates- there is a general acknowledgement of its status as an
artistic challenge, because it calls for a highly selective refinement of
visual elements and making room for a meeting space for both the heart and eye.
Diverging from the field of visual arts, it may or may not be surprising to
find out that the most passionate practitioners of minimalism are the very people
around us- regardless of whether they apply it in their worldview, way of life
or style. As the guinea pigs of a new age of excess, the naked and raw
simplicity of minimalism would very well be perceived as the next most
comforting alternative. u
Hm, an interesting breakdown on minimalism. I'm particularly fond of minimalism myself (3.1 phillip lim please and thank you) not so much for what you have explored, than the fact that it's amazingly versatile. You were probably exploring minimalism as an art or fashion form, but for me I take it all back down to the practical aspects of clothes. Nonetheless, an interesting piece and I must say you write very well (much better than I do, and I'm 15, well, going on 16) and I'm looking forward to more! (:
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Liz (rednotion@bs)
Thank you Elizabeth, I really appreciate your comment. Ultimately the aesthetic theory culminates in a material piece of work that is to be worn and marketed, so I think it's also important to consider the practical side of stuff. Your take on the regional fashion scene is stimulating too, good luck :)
Delete